Hi All,
Thought I would share my *subjective* review of the 2010 Outback 3.6R Limited with Nav as compared to the 2010 Nissan Murano LE AWD with Nav. This is based on my experience driving both vehicles back to back for over 40 miles each on the same day. Obviously, this is based only on my experience with two single vehicles and represents my personal opinion only, so please take it with a grain of salt (or the whole shaker of salt if needed!).
Overall the Murano addressed the two fatal flaws that I had with my OB - the driver seat and the steering feel. We had winds gusting to 30 mph the day of my test drive and the OB wandered a lot and felt very light at highway speeds. The Murano tracked precisely, had nicely weighted steering, and most importantly, while it transmitted a fair amount of "road feel" with those 20 inch wheels, it it did not shake or vibrate at all. It was well-planted, inspiring and most of all - FUN to drive (I missed those days!). In the ideal world, I would want the "Pro's" of each in my vehicle, but that was not possible, so here is my summary of each FWIW.
Outback Pro's
More like a wagon
Better AWD system - completely transparent
Powertrain - Feels faster with 5 speed and paddle shifters
Better visibility to the rear
Bigger Nav screen
Lower roof height
More cargo space
Smaller wheels - better ride and cheaper rubber
Lighter by 500 lbs or so (Murano is a bit of a porker!)
Better fuel economy and uses regular fuel
Murano Pro's
Precise and communicative steering
Very comfortable seats - especially for tall guys like me
Memory for seats, mirrors and sterring wheel position
Quieter cabin and highway cruise
Simpler and faster nav system - no lockouts for iPod control!
Bose stereo - very sweet with 2 subs
Very smooth CVT - definitely for cruising
Folding mirrors
Rear seat heaters and vent ducts
Smart key - can stay in your pocket for locking/unlocking and starting car
Bi-Xenon headlights
Comes in red
Story’s Author
